Two top headlines of the day are the Censorship From Government Industrial Complex and Biden reknewing Executive Order #13848!
Who really believes the Biden avatar reknewed the EO 13848 that places sanctions and seizes assets for election interference for both foreign and domestic? Who else could have possibly, maybe signed it?
If you believe Biden is all for this E.O., please share why you believe he is so?
We knew this about the Industrial Complex then, and now it is proven via secret reports. How many more things will be proven? Wonder if these are subject to the E.O. 13848?
Is working together to censor Americans before the 2020 election considered election interference? If so…then that would mean???
The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to take such actions, including the promulgation of rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to the President by IEEPA as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this order.
Including: section 1(b) of this order, as appropriate and consistent with applicable law, proposed sanctions with respect to the largest business entities licensed or domiciled in a country whose government authorized, directed, sponsored, or supported election interference, including at least one entity from each of the following sectors: financial services, defense, energy, technology, and transportation (or, if inapplicable to that country’s largest business entities, sectors of comparable strategic significance to that foreign government). The recommendation shall include an assessment of the effect of the recommended sanctions on the economic and national security interests of the United States and its allies. Any recommended sanctions shall be appropriately calibrated to the scope of the foreign interference identified, and may include one or more of the following with respect to each targeted foreign person:
(i) blocking and prohibiting all transactions in a person’s property and interests in
property subject to United States jurisdiction;
(ii) export license restrictions under any statute or regulation that requires the prior
review and approval of the United States Government as a condition for the export or
re-export of goods or services;
(iii) prohibitions on United States financial institutions making loans or providing
credit to a person;
(iv) restrictions on transactions in foreign exchange in which a person has any interest;
(v) prohibitions on transfers of credit or payments between financial institutions, or
by, through, or to any financial institution, for the benefit of a person;
(vi) prohibitions on United States persons investing in or purchasing equity or debt of
a person;
(vii) exclusion of a person’s alien corporate officers from the United States;
(viii) imposition on a person’s alien principal executive officers of any of the sanctions
described in this section; or
(ix) any other measures authorized by law.Sec. 4. I hereby determine that the making of donations of the type of articles specified insection 203(b)(2) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(2)) by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order would seriously impair my ability to deal with the national emergency declared in this order, and I hereby prohibit such donations as provided by section 2 of this order.
Sec. 5. The prohibitions in section 2 of this order include the following:
(a) the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; and
(b) the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services from any such person.
Sec. 6. I hereby find that the unrestricted immigrant and nonimmigrant entry into the United States of aliens whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, and I hereby suspend entry into the United States, as immigrants or nonimmigrants, of such persons. Such persons shall be treated as persons covered by section 1 of Proclamation 8693 of July 24, 2011 (Suspension of Entry of Aliens Subject to United Nations Security Council Travel Bans and International Emergency Economic
Powers Act Sanctions).
Sec. 7. (a) Any transaction that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, causes a violation of, or attempts to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.
(b) Any conspiracy formed to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is
prohibited.
Sec. 8. For the purposes of this order:
(a) the term “person” means an individual or entity;
(b) the term “entity” means a partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization;
(c) the term “United States person” means any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person (including a foreign person) in the United States;
(d) the term “election infrastructure” means information and communications technology and systems used by or on behalf of the Federal Government or a State or local government in managing the election process, including voter registration databases, voting machines, voting tabulation equipment, and equipment for the secure transmission of election results;
(e) the term “United States election” means any election for Federal office held on, or after, the date of this order;
(f) the term “foreign interference,” with respect to an election, includes any covert,
fraudulent, deceptive, or unlawful actions or attempted actions of a foreign government, or of any person acting as an agent of or on behalf of a foreign government, undertaken with the purpose or effect of influencing, undermining confidence in, or altering the result or reported result of, the election, or undermining public confidence in election processes or institutions;
(g) the term “foreign government” means any national, state, provincial, or other governing authority, any political party, or any official of any governing authority or political party, in each case of a country other than the United States;
(h) the term “covert,” with respect to an action or attempted action, means characterized by an intent or apparent intent that the role of a foreign government will not be apparent or acknowledged publicly; and
(i) the term “State” means the several States or any of the territories, dependencies, or possessions of the United States.
Sec. 9. For those persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, I find that because of the ability to transfer funds or other assets instantaneously, prior notice to such persons of measures to be taken pursuant to this order would render those measures ineffectual. I therefore determine that for these measures to be effective in addressing the national emergency declared in this order, there need be no prior notice of a listing or determination made pursuant to section 2 of this order.
Sec. 10. Nothing in this order shall prohibit transactions for the conduct of the official
business of the United States Government by employees, grantees, or contractors thereof.
Sec. 11. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to take such actions, including the promulgation of rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to the President by IEEPA as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this order. The Secretary of the Treasury may re-delegate any of these functions to other officers within the Department of the Treasury consistent with applicable law.
All agencies of the United States Government are hereby directed to take all appropriate measures within their authority to carry out the provisions of this order.
Sec. 12. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to submit the recurring and final reports to the Congress on the national emergency declared in this order, consistent with section 401(c) of the NEA (50 U.S.C. 1641(c)) and section 204(c) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1703(c)). Sec. 13. This order shall be implemented consistent with 50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(1) and (3). Sec. 14. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head
thereof; or
(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to
budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the
availability of appropriations.
(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
DONALD J. TRUMP
The White House,
September 12, 2018
Read full E.O. DCPD-201800593.pdf (govinfo.gov)
What can the two headlines possibly have in common?
They possibly, and most likely indicate, if it were even possible, maybe that Stanford and their entire international A.I. Bot programs that were also involved with the European Union, which were connected and or extended to Tavistock Institute in Great Britain (possibly due to the fact that Stanford was an offshoot of the same), would be or are in some real hot water? It could possibly also account for run on the banks causing closures (as confiscated assets would do just that). And could also explain the 34,000 plus EU UNICORN PROJECTS that were either closed or cancelled by billionaire philanthropists…(as we suspected last year in their demise) as they appeared then to have been linked to the E.O. and the confiscation and or freezing of assets of those who were caught? Possibly? But, hey… what do we know? We’re just data mined sheep who they program. Or so that’s what these think tank programmers believe.
Tavistock Institute is headquartered in London. Its prophet, Sigmond Freud, settled in Maresfield Gardens when he moved to England. He was given a mansion by Princess Bonaparte. Tavistock’s pioneer work in behavioral science along Freudian lines of “controlling” humans established it as the world center of foundation ideology. Its network now extends from the University of Sussex to the U.S. through the Stanford Research Institute, Esalen, MIT, <http://watch.pair.com/Hudson.html>HudsonInstitute, <http://watch.pair.com/heritage.html>Heritage Foundation, Center of Strategic and International Studies at Georgetown, where State Dept. personal are trained, US Air Force Intelligence, and the Rand and Mitre corporations. The personnel of the corporations are required to undergo indoctrination at one or more of these Tavistock controlled institutions. A network of secret groups, the Mont Pelerin Society, Trilateral Commission, Ditchley Foundation, and the Club of Rome is conduit for instructions to the Tavistock network. Read: The Tavistock Institute The Best Kept Secret in America | PDF | Rand Corporation | Lysergic Acid Diethylamide (scribd.com)
State Department ‘Outsourced’ Social-Media Censorship to Stanford Researchers, House GOP Probe Finds –
Excerpts: “This pressure was largely directed in a way that benefitted one side of the political aisle: true information posted by Republicans and conservatives was labeled as ‘misinformation’ while false information posted by Democrats and liberals was largely unreported and untouched by the censors,” the report reads. “The pseudoscience of disinformation is now—and has always been—nothing more than a political ruse most frequently targeted at communities and individuals holding views contrary to the prevailing narratives.”
“After reviewing misinformation reports submitted by federal officials, EIP researchers would compile a list of offending posts to submit to Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, TikTok, Reddit, and other major social-media platforms. The research group would then give specific recommendations to social-media platforms on how best to censor the posts. These actions include but are not limited to: “reducing the posts’ ‘discoverability,’ ‘suspending [an account’s] ability to continue tweeting for 12 hours,’ ‘monitoring if any of the tagged influencer accounts retweet’ a particular user, and … removing thousands of Americans’ posts.” Read: State Department ‘Outsourced’ Social-Media Censorship to Stanford Researchers, House GOP Probe Finds (msn.com)
Also read: “The ‘Censorship Industrial Complex’: A Deep Dive into Alleged Government-Academia Collusion”
Read: Unveiling the ‘Censorship Industrial Complex’: Alleged Govt. & Academia Collusion (bnn.network)
The New York Post Reports: New emails show DHS created Stanford ‘disinfo’ group that censored speech before 2020 election
The House panel’s 103-page staff interim report says never-before-seen emails and internal communications were obtained from the group, known as the Election Integrity Partnership (EIP), and show how it worked with DHS’ Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) to flag, suppress and remove online speech in coordination with big tech companies.
The online posts labeled “misinformation” were made by public officials such as former President Donald Trump.
“This pressure was largely directed in a way that benefitted one side of the political aisle: true information posted by Republicans and conservatives was labeled as ‘misinformation’ while false information posted by Democrats and liberals was largely unreported and untouched by the censors.” Read: New emails show DHS created Stanford ‘disinfo’ group that censored speech before 2020 election (msn.com)
Never forget, they also banned and censored users!!!
The Center Square Reports: Feds coordinated broad censorship of Americans on election, COVID, more–
(The Center Square) – The federal government coordinated with an array of entities to censor Americans’ speech online, a newly released report from the Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government shows.
In particular, the report shows that the Department of Homeland Security worked with Stanford and the Global Engagement Center, which works across agencies but sits under the State Department to create a streamlined process for identifying and censoring posts. Read: Report: Feds coordinated broad censorship of Americans on election, COVID, more | National | thecentersquare.com
Well folks, we shall see where this goes and how it unravels and who falls out as it does!
Remember the European Union appointed president Ursula Von Der Leyen was all wrapped into this mis and dis information campaign up to her UNICORN eyebrows and the EU UNICORN UNVEILING IN SILICON VALLEY, COVID mandates, Ukraine War, Sanctions, Climate Change, EV’s, and A.I. Social Credit Cards, and everything Swiss from chocolates to cheese and the failing WEF.
The European Union opened its new liaison office in California’s Silicon Valley in 2022, to streamline communication with U.S. tech companies, with new laws set to go into effect that will ramp up regulation of the technology sector in Europe.
“The EU’s executive branch, the European Commission, will run the new tech embassy, according to the Wall Street Journal. Gerard de Graaf, a senior executive at the European Commission who has worked on technology legislation, will lead the office in the San Francisco Bay area.” Read: EU opening new Silicon Valley office as it ramps up rules for Big Tech | The Hill
I wonder how this will unravel the WEF and their A.I. dreams for their global order? Perhaps it already has? How many holes are in the swiss cheese makers these days?
KEEP ON PRESSING INTO THE KINGDOM OF GOD! PRESS, PRESS, PRESS!
DIANNE
