The Wheat and the Tares Now Defined With E.I.

What is E.I.? It is Emotional Intelligence. Who has it? Let’s go down that rabbit hole…

Have you ever heard the term E.I.? It’s a term that first appeared in a 1964 paper by Michael Beldoch, and later in a paper in 1966 by B. Leuner titled “Emotional Intelligence and Emancipation” that appeared in the psychotherapeutic journal on the Practice of child psychology and child psychiatry. This all mushroomed out of the mind studies of Abraham Maslow in the 1950’s and his concept of “Emotional Strength”. It advanced into an Emotional lack of intelligence Timebomb of Mass Destruction! Just watch the people running the systems! It is so much like the wheat and the tares growing together until the harvest. It’s just now easy to see the tares among the wheat!

The 50’s and 60’s were the big experimental years when programming the masses in society was going full throttle and it never eased up. The mind controllers were, and still are, always seeking ways to control ones thoughts and instill their ideas into the minds of the citizens so they will think it is their own. Throughout the 1980’s and 90’s emotional intelligence was at the forefront to analyze and dissect as though that was some key to something in their world of mind control. Today, they just want people to get in line and bot up.

Cognitive Ability… another thing the deep state puppet masters hate about humanity. At least they hate those who have it and use it on their own without their direction!

Like President Trump!

image 222

In 1983, Howard Gardner’s book “Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences”, introduced the idea that traditional types of intelligence such as IQ do NOT explain cognitive ability. (Gee??? Really?) Because of this, he introduced the idea of multiple intelligences which included both interpersonal intelligence which is the capacity to understand the intentions, motivations and desires of other people, and intrapersonal intelligence which is the capacity to understand oneself and to appreciate one’s feelings, fears and motivations. (Note here we are looking at what a person feels and fears and how they are motivated by that. Sounds like mind control doesn’t it?) Thus from this came the term “EQ” which means “emotional quotient“. Which was first published by Keith Beasley in 1987 in the  British Mensa magazine.

Thus, by 1995 in another bestselling book titled, “Emotional Intelligence ” by science journalist Daniel Goleman, he defined EI as the array of skills and characteristics that drive leadership performance. From there came the debates from researchers as to whether or not emotional intelligence can be learned and strengthened, or if it is strictly an inborn characteristic.

Stay with me here… we are just laying the background so you will understand the point we are coming to make. In 1998, Goleman published a Harvard Business Review article titled “What Makes a Leader?” This article caught the attention of senior management at Johnson & Johnson’s Consumer Companies (JJCC). The article explained the importance of Emotional Intelligence (E.I.) in leadership success, and cited several studies that demonstrated that E.I. is often the distinguishing factor between great leaders and average leaders.

Johnson & Johnson CC then funded a study which showed that there was a strong relationship between superior performing leaders and emotional competence, which supported the theories that suggested that the social, emotional, and relational competency referred to as Emotional Intelligence is a distinguishing factor in leadership performance.

Now here comes the dividing line. And the part they do not consider. It’s called the Holy Spirit!

In Daniel Goleman’s Mixed model it focuses on E.I. as a wide array of competencies and skills that drive leadership performance.

Goleman’s model outlines five main EI constructs:

  1. Self-awareness – the ability to know one’s emotions, strengths, weaknesses, drives, values, and goals and recognize their impact on others while using gut feelings to guide decisions.
  2. Self-regulation – involves controlling or redirecting one’s disruptive emotions and impulses and adapting to changing circumstances.
  3. Social skill – managing relationships to get along with others.
  4. Empathy – considering other people’s feelings especially when making decisions.
  5. Motivation – being aware of what motivates them.

What do these qualities sound like to you? These sure sound like the qualities the Lord told us to apply to others. It has to do with loving your neighbor as yourself and doing unto others as you would have them do unto you. This is something that comes from the heart, and from within, and definitely is guided by the gut feeling of which most all believe that is where the Holy Spirit gives you the feeling to do this or that from. They have also found it is the gut that tells the heart and the brain what to do. They now call the gut the second brain.

That Gut feeling has baffled scientists and medical researchers. They have come up with all sorts of philosophies, concepts and theories to explain this phenomenon. They keep coming up short of the truth of it. I liken it to the Urim and the Thummim in the breastplate of the High Priest, who when going before the Arc of the Covenant would ask a question of the Lord and the Holy Spirit would answer by the stones, which was a part of the shadow of things to come. Today the gut feeling works like the stones of the Urim and the Thummim.

image 219

The Urim and Thummim (Heb. 28:15–30; Lev. 8:4) were priestly devices used for obtaining oracles. The priest, acting on behalf of the ruler, inquired of YHWH through the Urim. In the postexilic era, hard questions were never asked until the priest was present. If the Israelis are guilty of this crime, the punishment should be Urim, not Thummim. I Sam.

The Bible tells us the first high priest Aaron, brother of Moses, wore the breastplate over the priestly ephod or tunic, and Joshua consulted the Urim and Thummim through the high priest Eleazar wearing the priest’s breastplate. The Urim and Thummim were a foreshadowing of the Messiah, Jesus Christ, who called himself “the light of the world,” (John 8:12) and who became sacrificed (1 Peter 1:18-19) for humanity’s sins. Read: Urim and Thummim: Objects Used to Determine God’s Will (

After the captivity of the Israelites in Babylon, the Urim and Thummim disappeared and were never mentioned again. And so was the Arc of the Covenant which in the book of Maccabees it tells us the Arc was removed and hidden by Jeremiah.

Today, we are the Temple and the Lord and Holy Spirit resides in us who have faith and believe. Read the book of Hebrews.

image 220

Goleman has made up a set of emotional competencies within each construct of EI. He says these EC’s are not innate talents, but rather learned capabilities that must be worked on and can be developed to achieve outstanding performance. He says that individuals are born with a general emotional intelligence that determines their potential for learning emotional competencies. His model of EI has been criticized in the research literature as mere “pop psychology“.

But wait… what about Emotional Intelligence and Bullys? If Goleman’s work has any weight, shouldn’t they be able to just teach others to have empathy and do unto others in a nice manner?

It appears that bullying, which is an abusive social interaction between peers that can include aggression, harassment and violence, is typically repetitive and enacted by those who are in a position of power over the victim. Recent research has found a significant connection between bullying and emotional intelligence, it appears that bully mindset lacks Emotional Intelligence! At least as it is defined.

“Emotional intelligence (EI) is a set of abilities related to the understanding, use, and management of emotion as it relates to one’s self and others. Mayer et al. define EI as: “accurately perceiving emotion, using emotions to facilitate thought, understanding emotion, and managing emotion”. The concept combines emotional and intellectual processes. Lower emotional intelligence appears to be related to involvement in bullying, as the bully and/or the victim of bullying. EI seems to play an important role in both bullying behavior and victimization in bullying; given that EI is illustrated to be malleable, EI education could improve bullying prevention and intervention initiatives.Read: Bullying and emotional intelligence – Wikipedia

There is one big fat downfall in this idea of teaching it to those who don’t have it. It doesn’t work!

In tests of cognitive ability, the MSCEIT “tests knowledge of emotions but not necessarily the ability to perform tasks that are related to the knowledge that is assessed”. If someone knows how they should behave in an emotionally laden situation, it does not necessarily follow that they could actually carry out the reported behavior.

Kind of like children playing. They know they aren’t supposed to get upset and slap their friend, but… alas… Jimmy got mad, and reacted and slapped little Tommy.

EI as a measure of conformity have also shown that those with high EI do better at conforming to things like “not slapping their coworkers” than those with low EI. (That’s my in a nutshell version of their MSCEIT tests and findings. Smile.)

EI as a form of knowledge have shown that the MSCEIT “tests knowledge of emotions but not necessarily the ability to perform tasks that are related to the knowledge that is assessed.” In short, that means if someone knows how they should behave in an emotionally charged situation, it does NOT MEAN they will be able to carry out or apply that proper behavior.

Therefore, there are those such as a researcher named Locke, who claims that the concept of EI is a misinterpretation of the intelligence construct, and he believes EI is not another form or type of intelligence, but the concept should be re-labeled and referred to as a skill. So if Jimmy decides not to haul off and hit Tommy it’s a skill?

It is obvious now that the breed of liberals that the “Globalist Orwellian Surveillance Society” has bred have low Emotional Intelligence. They are NOT capable of doing unto others as they would have them to do unto them within their present lower emotional intelligence (EI) level, be it a skill, or a learned concept. The fact is that their so called Emotional Quotient or (EQ) and low cognitive thought processes that accompany their decision making processes make them subject to their inner feelings and their need to express those feelings being greater than their skill level not to. Thus we see the “Trump Derangement Syndrome” played out in all age groups.

image 221

We are also watching this unleashed on society in the Trump Indictments. We are learning how these ones think, and react even within high places in the Justice System.

We have been watching this play out for a very long time and now they are in our faces and hiding nothing. This is a world where there is no law except that of the emotionally disturbed and their self-will tantrums and perverted decisions generally guided by psychotic emotional outbursts that give them a feeling of power. Meanwhile those with high levels of emotional intelligence, who truly consider their fellow man and strive to do unto others as they would have done unto them… are called sheep because they don’t go nuts when attacked by bullies.

If anyone ever desired to study such emotional depravity… now is the time to observe, jot down notes and make assessments. These are classic displays of low EI in high places and the outcome of a society without emotional maturity and or emotional intelligence, which is necessary in order to have civility in any society.

The Justice System without any fair sense of judging is a destroyer of law and order and eventually will breed total revolt from people who have high E.I. and will not allow the lawlessness to have any length of staying power. i.e. it will be short lived and end in civil revolt. This is the sort of madness that has toppled kings out of their thrones in past empires.

The alternative is to expose the lawless ones and have them held accountable for their crimes against humanity. The professionals can figure out whatever name they want to call this process. Meanwhile, until they do… let’s just call it the separation of the wheat from the tares. Smile.



By Dianne Marshall

I don't sleep I write! Author, Graphic Artist, Researcher and lover of the truth.

5 2 votes
Article Rating
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments