The United States Inc.


Don’t rush into an irreversible situation with your citizenship in the middle of a war. Many are rushing out and removing themselves from the USA, Inc. Or so they believe that is what they are doing. It could be a trap to do much more immediate harm. Remember we are at war and nothing is as it appears. You don’t win back your nation by denouncing it. That being said, here are some facts.

The International Monetary Fund has owned the citizens of the United States of America since March 9, 1933 when the USA, Inc.  first went into bankruptcy.  This is when they took us off of the Gold standard and placed all persons into a social system that issued each one a  social security number and officially made each “person” a bond that could be sold for money.  US bonds. You’ve heard to invest in bonds?  Bonds is from the word bondage. The world invests in the people of the Inc. who are in voluntary bondage to it. You are volunteering your bondage by following the Feudal System that has placed you in bondage.  You are no longer an individual with rights, you are a bond servant to the system as long as you allow them to include you voluntarily.

What can you do to remove yourself from this bond system?  Since you never agreed to it, you can simply stop agreeing to it. Now, that sounds easier than it can be administered for individuals do not know the law, they are not educated in the truth of their rights, but they are deceived at every turn to stay in bondage to the system.

Government Bond, Sun Historical Assets Redemption Progarm | Facebook

We are citizens of the United States of America  which is a Republic and not the United States, Inc. which is owned by the Crown of England.  Technically, the USA has always been subject to the Crown for taxation. And in 1871 became owned by the corporation…however, individuals cannot be subject to ownership by a corporation but a person or thing can be, thus you are a person of the corporation, if you allow it.

Person means:

 A person is the object of legal rights. There are two kinds of legal person: human beings and artificial persons such as corporations. A PARTNERSHIP in England is not a separate legal person but in Scotland it is said to have quasi-personality.

Collins Dictionary of Law © W.J. Stewart, 2006

PERSON. This word is applied to men, women and children, who are called natural persons. In law, man and person are not exactly synonymous terms. Any human being is a man, whether he be a member of society or not, whatever may be the rank he holds, or whatever may be his age, sex, &c. A person is a man considered according to the rank he holds in society, with all the rights to which the place he holds entitles him, and the duties which it imposes. 1 Bouv. Inst. n. 137.

     2. It is also used to denote a corporation which is an artificial person. 1 Bl. Com. 123; 4 Bing. 669; C. 33 Eng. C. L R. 488; Woodes. Lect. 116; Bac. Us. 57; 1 Mod. 164.

     3. But when the word “Persons” is spoken of in legislative acts, natural persons will be intended, unless something appear in the context to show that it applies to artificial persons. 1 Scam. R. 178.

     4. Natural persons are divided into males, or men; and females or women. Men are capable of all kinds of engagements and functions, unless by reasons applying to particular individuals. Women cannot be appointed to any public office, nor perform any civil functions, except those which the law specially declares them capable of exercising. Civ. Code of Louis. art. 25.

     5. They are also sometimes divided into free persons and slaves. Freemen are those who have preserved their natural liberty, that is to say, who have the right of doing what is not forbidden by the law. A slave is one who is in the power of a master to whom he belongs. Slaves are sometimes ranked not with persons but things. But sometimes they are considered as persons for example, a negro is in contemplation of law a person, so as to be capable of committing a riot in conjunction with white men. 1 Bay, 358. Vide Man.

     6. Persons are also divided into citizens, (q.v.) and aliens, (q.v.) when viewed with regard to their political rights. When they are considered in relation to their civil rights, they are living or civilly dead; vide Civil Death; outlaws; and infamous persons.

     7. Persons are divided into legitimates and bastards, when examined as to their rights by birth.

     8. When viewed in their domestic relations, they are divided into parents and children; husbands and wives; guardians and wards; and masters and servants son, as it is understood in law, see 1 Toull. n. 168; 1 Bouv. Inst. n. 1890, note.

A Law Dictionary, Adapted to the Constitution and Laws of the United States. By John Bouvier. Published 1856.

On the US Citizenship Laws and Policy Government Website there is a section that shows you how to obtain a non citizen nationality status. The Link is:  Travel ( The page shows you the U.S. Citizenship Laws and Policy. At the bottom of that page you will find a link that shows a free person of the United States of America how to regain their national status to the Republic. The headline is: Other Citizenship and Nationality Links under that you can click on the link:

It will open up to the information below that allows you to pursue your noncitizen of the US corporation status.

Whereas we desire liberty don’t be in a hurry to jump on this strange denounce your citizenship bandwagon. Something feels wrong about this. Just saying….

Certificates of Non Citizen Nationality

The Department of State occasionally receives requests for certificates of non-citizen national status pursuant to Section 341(b)of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 USC 1452(b).

As the title of the certificate indicates, only a person who is a non-citizen U.S. national (i.e., a U.S. national but not a U.S. citizen) may apply for such a certificate.

As defined by the Immigration and Nationality Act, all U.S. citizens are U.S. nationals but only a relatively small number of persons acquire U.S. nationality without becoming U.S. citizens. Section 101(a)(21) of the INA defines the term “national” as “a person owing permanent allegiance to a state.” Section 101(a)(22) of the INA provides that the term “national of the United States” includes all U.S. citizens as well as persons who, though not citizens of the United States, owe permanent allegiance to the United States (non-citizen nationals).

Section 308 INA confers U.S. nationality but not U.S. citizenship, on persons born in “an outlying possession of the United States” or born of a parent or parents who are non-citizen nationals who meet certain physical presence or residence requirements. The term “outlying possessions of the United States” is defined in Section 101(a)(29) of the INA as American Samoa and Swains Island. No other statutes define any other territories or any of the states as outlying possessions.

In addition to Section 308 of the INA, Section 302 of Public Law 94 – 241 provides for certain inhabitants of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, who became United States citizens by virtue of Article III of the Covenant, to opt for non-citizen national status. (See requirements of Section 302).

As the Department has received few requests, there is no justification for the creation of a non-citizen national certificate. Designing a separate document that includes anti-fraud mechanisms was seen as an inefficient expenditure of resources. Therefore, the Department determined that those who would be eligible to apply for such a certificate may instead apply for a United States passport that would delineate and certify their status as a national but not a citizen of the United States.

If a person believes he or she is eligible under the law as a non-citizen national of the United States and the person complies with the provisions of section 341(b) of the INA, 8 USC 1452(b),he/she may apply for a passport at any Passport Agency in the United States.. When applying, applicants must execute a Form DS-11 and show documentary proof of their non-citizen national status as well as their identity.

Pertinent Sections of Law on Non-Citizen Nationality

Section 341 of the Immigration and Nationality Act:

(b) A person who claims to be a national, but not a citizen, of the United States may apply to the Secretary of State for a certificate of non-citizen national status. Upon – (1) proof to the satisfaction of the Secretary of State that the applicant is a national, but not a citizen, of the United States; and, (2) in the case of a non-citizen national born outside of the United States or its outlying possessions, taking and subscribing, before an immigration officer within the United States or its outlying possessions, to the oath of allegiance required of an applicant for naturalization.

Section 101(a)(21) of the Immigration and Nationality Act:

The term “national” means a person owing permanent allegiance to a state.

Section 101(a)(29) of the Immigration and Nationality Act:

The term “outlying possessions of the United States” means American Samoa and Swains Island.

Section 101(a)(36) of the Immigration and Nationality Act:

The term “State” includes the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Virgin Islands of the United States.

Section 308 of the Immigration and Nationality Act:

Unless otherwise provided in section 301 of this title, the following shall be nationals, but not citizens of the United States at birth:

(1) A person born in an outlying possession of the United States on or after the date of formal acquisition of such possession;

(2) A person born outside the United States and is outlying possessions of parents both of whom are nationals, but not citizens, of the United States, and have had a residence in the United States, or one of its outlying possessions prior to the birth of such person;

(3) A person of unknown parentage found in an outlying possession of the United States while under the age of five years, until shown, prior to attaining the age of twenty-one years, not to have been born in such outlying possessions; and

(4) A person born outside the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a national, but not a citizen, of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than seven years in any continuous period of ten years –

(A) during which the national parent was not outside the United States or its outlying possessions for a continuous period of more than one year, and

(B) at least five years of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years.

The proviso of section (301(g) shall apply to the national parent under this paragraph in the same manner as it applies to the citizen parent under that section.

Section 302 of Public Law 94 – 241:

Any person who becomes a citizen of the United States solely by virtue of the provisions in Section 301 [applying to those born in or residing in the Northern Mariana Islands] may within six months after the effective date of that Section or within six months after reaching the age of 18 years, whichever date is later, become a national but not a citizen of the United States by making a declaration under oath before any court established by the Constitution or laws of the United States or any other court of record in the Commonwealth in the form as follows ” I _____ being duly sworn, hereby declare my intention to be a national but not a citizen of the United States.”

Again, go to: Travel (

Corporatocracy - Wikipedia

The “Federal” Government that these politicians have formed is a Separate Nation and should be called the name they have given it, and that name is the United States, Incorporated.

They can no longer hide the fact that there are two governments operating in this country which are:

The United States of America is the Republic government created by the states, for the states, created by the people, for the people…

And the US government, which is a corporate government, or corporation. This federal government, should be called the United States of America, Incorporated outwardly as well as in secret on their documents.

The fact is, Corporations are not allowed by law to become politically charged in terms of their controls over the masses of a region.

The Illegal fraudulent Government in Washington D.C. Is a business! You don’t have to belong to it nor work for it!

A corporation is simply an entity which makes its own rules for its own employees and for its own structural operation. The US government, which is on a ten acre parcel of property in Washington D.C. (District of Columbia), outside the United States of America is a corporation that has cleverly usurped the government, through policies and language in documents, but had no legal authority to do so from the nationals who put them in power to serve We The People.

This Awareness indicates that any action whereby this  corporation known as the United States Federal Government attempts to make laws, to impose laws on the states or on the people that have not been authorized by the states of the people, operates illegally. This Awareness indicates that any of the states or the people who give their allegiance, and give their rights to such a government based on fraud are doing so illegally and or in ignorance. Anyone who volunteers to let such a foreign entity control their lives is volunteering their freedom away illegally, or blindly and when the majority of citizens learn what has taken place, they will not continue to allow this scam. The fake government in Washington D.C. will be a spectacle of shame.

The Federal government, will be seen as the foreign entity it is to the United States of America, and not a part of the United States. The people will know that it is in fact controlled by those who do the bidding of the international bankers and by the laws and rules of the United Nations, whose goals are global and not of the people of the United States of America, the Republic.

And now we know why the laws they pass to control the people of the Inc. never apply to those in the congress and the senate. That is because the so called politicians are acting outside the country, they are a foreign entity in the second nation known as the Federal government, which is the US, Inc..

US War Bonds on Old Time Radio – Old Radio

This is a two edged sword as the United States Federal government, Inc. and the United States of America are two different countries, and the Constitution of the United States of America is not the law of the United States Federal government. Therefore, these entities cannot, while in the District of Colombia, be accused of treason. They are operating on behalf of the foreign bankers and their special interests.

So, how do we get around this one? It appears we have to catch them at a higher criminal level along the lines of RICO….but then again, as a Corporation… they can given themselves bonuses, and gifts…but, there are laws governing corruption and white collar crimes by corporations. And now we see why they are going after the crimes… and why it is not so easy to just call treason… and why the Logan Act has never successfully been used on these crooks, or shall we rather say… has never even been attempted to be used on them. They are a corporation and that simply does not apply here.

But, not so fast, on the other side of that solution, lurks another problem that could be an issue….

From an article titled: “Court Declares Corporations Are People, Some Human Beings Are Not”, By Jeffrey Kaplan, Published February 8, 2008, Kaplan points out that, “In evaluating allegations that U.S. military forces deprived four British men of human rights during two years they were held captive in Guantanamo Bay prison, a U.S. appeals court found an innovative way to let the Bush administration off the hook. Two of three judges ruled the men — because they are not U.S. citizens and, technically, were not imprisoned in the U.S. — were not legally “persons” and, therefore, had no rights to violate.”

This gives one pause to not be in a big hurry to claim national status…at least not until some of this gets looked into more thorough and we clean up a lot of the corruption that is causing these issues in the first place.  The article pointed out that judges were defying common sense and decency by denying legal personhood to living human beings, while an appeals court in Boston was reviewing another whopper lacking common sense on an  April 2007 decision by Federal Judge Paul Barbadoro that — granted human rights to corporations.

US Federal Reserve Bond Scam | Lunaticg Coin

Barbadoro struck down a New Hampshire law that prevented pharmaceutical corporations from learning exactly what drugs doctors prescribe and how much they prescribe. The law aims to protect doctors and, indirectly, their patients, from drug companies pressuring doctors to choose their products. Of which we all now know where that type of legislation has led us in this war for our right to control what goes into our own bodies.

Kaplan put it this way, “The real issue in these cases (Maine recently passed a similar law) isn’t free speech at all; it’s manipulation and control. The drug salespeople only will decide what to say after poking into the doctors’ prescription records. Under the guise of protecting speech, Judge Barbadoro denied both legitimate privacy rights of doctors and key protections to ensure patients are prescribed drugs based on their medical situation, not pressure applied to their physician.

“Taken together, these two rulings are a perplexing and dangerous development. The founding principle of our country is right in the Declaration of Independence: all people are “endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights.” It is not for judges to decide who is and who is not a human being.

“Nor should the courts play Creator by endowing legal constructs like corporations with human rights. Our constitutional rights exist to prevent large, powerful institutions — whether governments, corporations, or other entities — from oppressing us humans.

“The judge’s grounds? He claims corporations, as legal persons, have “free speech rights” that would be infringed by such a measure.


Kaplan ended by saying, “Soon, the only citizens with real power in the United States may be the corporate kind.” I am wondering if we can get creative here and think of a way to incorporate against the corporation? There may be a legal way that by using their own laws, the only way to end their evil is for new laws be forced or use the same weapon against them. It sure is worth a thought…it just might be a win win for the Republic. Or a strong arm in the intermedium. 

For now… I would say…. Do NOT FOLLOW ANYONE BLINDLY AND give up your citizenship in the middle of a war!!!!

Keep on Pressing into the Kingdom of God. Press, press, press!


By Dianne Marshall

I don't sleep I write! Author, Graphic Artist, Researcher and lover of the truth.

5 5 votes
Article Rating
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments