Cheny When You Yeast Expect It – On The Rise…

Just not in the way you think… she’s done for!

A little leaven leavens the whole lump is a metaphor the apostle Paul used to compare the effects of false teaching in the church to the results of yeast in bread dough in Galatians 5:9. So, in that respect a RINO, even a small amount of them will make the entire progressive democracy rise, infiltrating the entire Republican party and heaving over into the constitution and the bill of rights, and all of “we the people”, and every freedom loving citizen. Cheney has an agenda, not a party.

image 132

But, you can’t help but look and see Saturday Night Live impersonations look as real as Liz’s double(s) these days.

And Dick? Give me a break… his video promoting Liz just brought out his true colors again. Makes a person wonder how he got away with his 911 and all the Halliburton deals. But, then again… he’s in the club. But, just like Zelensky they have their way of making deals and fixing loose ends, and wrap up smears to cover up doo doo. Today most everyone knows how the machine works, but back then… if you said a peep you were called the liar and conspiracy nut. The fake news programmers that are clinging to a rating, are all but fallen, are fallen….into the same cess pool of goo that operates for lots of $$$$ money by BIG PROPAGANDA.

Remember the 2010 BP Oil Spill and the Halliburton Involvement?

image 128

Headlines Read, “Destroy These Results”!

The US Department of Justice said that prior to the blowout at the rig, Halliburton had recommended to BP that the Macondo well contain 21 centralisers – metal collars that can improve cementing.

However, BP chose to use only six.

The justice department said that Halliburton had run two computer simulations of the Macondo well’s final cementing job to compare the impact of using six versus 21 centralisers. It said the results of these simulations indicated that there was little difference.

The department said that Halliburton’s programme manager “was directed to, and did, destroy these results”.

“Efforts to forensically recover the original destroyed Displace 3D computer simulations during ensuing civil litigation and federal criminal investigation by the Deepwater Horizon Task Force were unsuccessful,” it added. “In agreeing to plead guilty, Halliburton has accepted criminal responsibility for destroying the aforementioned evidence.” Read: Halliburton to plead guilty to destroying Gulf evidence – BBC News

They paid a $200,000 fine which was peanuts to that company and took a 3 year probation. Now we all know there had to be some off shore thank you’s paid to Cheney’s Halliburton company... but that is just speculation.

But hey, today Halliburton and BP are still good chums. Even though the accident cost BP some billions. It seemed to get someone something they wanted. Did we ever find out who exactly? But isn’t that how we all do… shake hands and continue doing business with the ones who advise you wrong (cough, wink) and then plot the future together? (Cough…cough…wink…wink). READ: Halliburton and Aker BP Collaborate to Develop Next Generation Field Development Planning

Follow the who, what, when, where, and forget the why… remember the history: Bp and Aker to sale Aker BP’s shares through private placement (energycapitalmedia.com)

Halliburton and Cheney: War Profiteers in chief Fight To Keep Their Wallets Fat

By Rick Jacobs, Contributor (Sep 17, 2006, 06:34 PM EDT|Updated May 25, 2011)

Halliburton’s stock has risen 200% since the invasion of Iraq three and a half years ago. David Lesar, its CEO, made over $40,000,000 in 2004 alone.

READ: Halliburton and Cheney: War Profiteers in Chief Fight to Keep Their Wallets Fat | HuffPost Latest News

FOLLOW THE MONEY – HALLIBURTON MADE 39.5 BILLION FROM THE IRAQ WAR!

image 130

Excerpt from “The Intellectualist” –

There are some on the left eager to embrace President George W. Bush simply because occasionally he criticizes Donald Trump.

It bears reminding: the Invasion of Iraq was a premeditated fraud on the American people, meant to help and enrich the few even if this led to the deaths of millions and the depopulation of entire regions of the world.

Halliburton — once run by former Vice President Dick Cheney — and its spin off, KBR, were the biggest recipients of government largess derived from the destruction of Iraq. READ: Reminder: Halliburton Made $39.5 Billion From The Iraq War – The Intellectualist: Current Events, Culture and Science (mavenroundtable.io)

Trump knows EVERYTHING… AND THAT MEANS THINGS NONE OF US KNOW. We only get the crumbs they couldn’t hide, and have to sort through the ashes of things like 911 and smouldering oil rigs.

And of course…no one was paying a lot of attention … but a few were.

Cheney Admits that He Lied about 9/11 – New York Times

Cheney lied about numerous other facts related to 9/11 as well.  For example, Cheney:

READ: http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/03/cheney-admits-that-he-lied-about-911.html

image 129

Why Cheney’s confession “We did 9/11” appears to be authentic

By Kevin BarrettVeterans Today Editor

Former Vice President Dick Cheney surprised the world this morning during an interview in his luxurious Jackson Hole residence when he admitted that the fourteen-year-old rumors that 9/11 was an inside job were actually true.

In an exclusive interview with The Hollywood Inquirer, Cheney explained that the only way to move toward a global Pax Americana was by engineering a “New Pearl Harbor.”

“When we assumed office in January 2001 and saw we were losing control of the world, we all panicked,” claims Cheney, obviously very emotional. “We didn’t know what to do. And Paul Wolfowitz, our strategist, suggested we rig up an attack on America as a temporary solution. The militarized police state was only supposed to last for a few years. But as time went by and nobody seemed to notice, we kept playing along.”

Mr. Cheney alleges that the cabal did send out a lot of hidden messages through the years to prepare the population for the truth. Rumsfeld’s speeches have been full of references to “the missile that hit this building (the Pentagon)” and “the flight we shot down over Pennsylvania.”

READ: Cheney Admits that He Lied about 9/11 | From the Trenches World Report

image 154

Some Highlights From “The Executive Intelligence Review” From September 2003, Titled:

“Cheney’s Role in 9/11 Put on Center Stage by British MP” by Mark Burdman

“The conventional explanation is that after the Twin Towers were hit, retaliation against al-Qaeda bases in Afghanistan was a natural first step in launching a global war against terrorism. Then, because Saddam Hussein was alleged by the U.S. and U.K. governments to retain weapons of mass destruction, the war could be extended to Iraq as well. However this theory does not fit all the facts. The truth may be a great deal murkier.”

He went on: “We now know that a blueprint for the creation of a global Pax Americana was drawn up for Dick Cheney (now Vice President), Donald Rumsfeld (Defense Secretary), Paul Wolfowitz (Rumsfeld’s deputy), Jeb Bush (George Bush’s younger brother) and Lewis Libby (Cheney’s chief of staff). The document, entitled ‘Rebuilding America’s Defenses,’ was written in September 2000 by the neo-conservative think-tank, Project for the New American Century (PNAC).

image 153

“The plan shows Bush’s cabinet intended to take military control of the Gulf region whether or not Saddam Hussein was in power. It says ‘while the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate justification, the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein.’ “

Meacher noted that the PNAC blueprint supported an earlier document attributed to Wolfowitz and Libby which said the United States must “discourage advanced industrial nations from challenging our leadership or even aspiring to a larger regional or global role.” This early-1990s “Pentagon Guidance Document,” a.k.a. “the Wolfowitz doctrine,” prescribes pre-emptive military action, and implicitly, pre-emptive nuclear strikes, against potential challenges to an American or Anglo-American empire.

It had been known as early as 1996 that there were plans to hit Washington targets with aeroplanes. Then in 1999 a U.S. national intelligence council report noted that ‘al-Qaeda suicide bombers could crash-land an aircraft packed with high explosives into the Pentagon, the headquarters of the CIA, or the White House.’

Cheney, then Defense Secretary in President H.W. Bush’s Administration, supported this outrage, which was nixed then by senior Administration figures, including the President. With Bush Jr., the policy has been implemented.

In detailing the September 2000 PNAC blueprint, Meacher noted that it refers to allies such as the U.K., as “the most effective and efficient means of exercising American global leadership.” Further, the blueprint also calls for “regime change” in China, and advocates imperial control of space and cyberspace, and development of new biological weapons. “Finally—written a year before 9/11—it pinpoints North Korea, Syria and Iran as dangerous regimes, and says their existence justifies the creation of a ‘worldwide command and control system.’ This is a blueprint for U.S. world domination. But before it is dismissed as an agenda for rightwing fantasists, it is clear it provides a much better explanation of what actually happened before, during and after 9/11 than the global war on terrorism thesis. This can be seen in several ways.”

image 152

Meacher reported that “the PNAC blueprint of September 2000 states that the process of transforming the U.S. into ‘tomorrow’s dominant force’ is likely to be a long one in the absence of ‘some catastrophic and catalyzing event—like a new Pearl Harbor.’ ” He concluded with the charge that “the ‘global war on terrorism’ has the hallmarks of a political myth propagated to pave the way for a wholly different agenda—the U.S. goal of world hegemony, built around securing by force, command over the oil supplies required to drive the whole project.”

Important as is the publication of this charge, from Tony Blair’s own party in Parliament, to narrow the “Cheney project” to a physiocratic grab for scarce energy supplies fails to grasp the “nature of the beast.”

Cheney’s neo-conservative faction is the modern-day embodiment of the fascist-synarchist forces, that threatened both the Britain and the United States in the 1940s. Pulling his strings are powerful financier forces—descendants of those private banking families and financial interests who brought Adolf Hitler to power in Germany, and supported Mussolini’s dictatorship in Italy. Their aim now, as then, is to establish a world empire that would salvage a crisis-ridden financial system, and eliminate the American humanist-republican tradition associated with Benjamin Franklin, Abraham Lincoln, and Franklin Roosevelt.

LaRouche has demonstrated that 9/11 was a “Reichstag Fire,” allowing for dictatorial measures at home, and for Samuel P. Huntington’s Clash of Civilizations pitting Western nations against Islam, and potentially China.

The game is much more dangerous than Meacher has described it. But with publication of his article, the “Reichstag Fire” issue—and crucially, that of the relation between the Cheney’s gang’s desires and Tony Blair’s actions as British Prime Minister—is out in the open. Read the full article: Cheney’s Role in 9/11 Put on Center Stage by British MP (larouchepub.com)

AND NOW…THE QUESTION IS…WHERE WAS THE FBI WHEN BUSH AND OBAMA WERE IN OFFICE?

image 131

DISCLAIMER: IF YOU LISTEN TO THIS, YOU MAY GET VERY ANGRY… JUST LOOK AT HER DESPERATE, AND PATHETIC ZELENSKY LIFE AND IMAGINE SENDING HER TO UKRAINE WHERE SHE FITS IN MUCH BETTER.

KEEP ON PRESSING INTO THE KINGDOM OF GOD! PRESS, PRESS, PRESS!

DIANNE

By Dianne Marshall

I don't sleep I write! Author, Graphic Artist, Researcher and lover of the truth.

5 3 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

To avoid waiting on comment approval; sign up with The Marshall Report or log-in with your WordPress.com ID.

15 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments