Do you believe all the monster storm phenomena we have been experiencing is really just nature? I question it. Do you believe the weather station can now predict that four days from the date of their broadcast that there will be 40 inches of rain over a specific geographical location in one day? I do. Why? Because they are designing it to be exactly as they predict!
Gone are the days that the weather man can’t predict the weather. Today, they can because their sources tell them what to say, based on what they are doing.
There is an attack on Christian America and its’ people. The great merchants of the earth own this monster storm creator, and we know their agenda. By the way…. Corpus Christy in Latin means body of Christ. Coincidence? No more a coincidence than ANTIFA, BLM, AND ALL GEORGE SOROS FUNDED RESISTANCE MOVEMENTS. Soros is in league with the NWO cabal. This storm has Kabbalah written all over it. And, unless the people call them out, it is all legal. IT IS UP TO THE PEOPLE TO EXPOSE THIS AND SEND A MESSAGE TO TRUMP THAT ENOUGH IS ENOUGH! Drain the weather modification swamp….don’t let them continue to turn God’s people who support Trump into a swamp! If you haven’t figured it out…that is what appears to be taking place. Reverse swamp draining! If you have figured it out – send a message to President Trump at the Whitehouse at whitehouse.gov
In July 1972 the U.S. Government renounced the use of climate modification techniques for hostile purposes, even if their development were proved to be feasible in the future.
It’s all out there in plain site.
The following excerpts are from the United States Website:
Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation
Signed in Geneva May 18, 1977
Entered into force October 5, 1978
Article I sets forth the basic commitment: “Each State Party to this Convention undertakes not to engage in military or any other hostile use of environmental modification techniques having widespread, long-lasting or severe effects as the means of destruction, damage or injury to any other State Party.” An understanding defines the terms “widespread, long-lasting or severe.” “Widespread” is defined as “encompassing an area on the scale of several hundred square kilometers”; “long-lasting” is defined as “lasting for a period of months, or approximately a season”; and “severe” is defined as “involving serious or significant disruption or harm to human life, natural and economic resources or other assets.”
With regard to peaceful uses of environmental modification techniques, the convention provides that the parties shall have the right to participate in the fullest possible exchange of scientific and technological information.
So what are these peaceful uses? It appears to mean, anything that does not become long lasting – a period of months? Or a season? Severe is involving serious or significant disruption or harm to human life, natural and economic resources or other assets? What do they determine to be Significant? That is the question. The other question is – DO YOU TRUST THE PEOPLE IN CHARGE OF THEIR ENVIORNMENTAL MODIFICATION TECHNIQUES? The House of Rothschilds now own these techniques along with the weather station. Do you trust them?
More from the Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation:
UNDERSTANDINGS REGARDING THE CONVENTION
Understanding Relating to Article I
It is the understanding of the Committee that, for the purposes of this Convention, the terms, “widespread”, “long-lasting” and “severe” shall be interpreted as follows:
(b) “long-lasting”: lasting for a period of months, or approximately a season;
(c) “severe”: involving serious or significant disruption or harm to human life, natural and economic resources or other assets.
(a) “widespread”: encompassing an area on the scale of several hundred square kilometres;
It is further understood that the interpretation set forth above is intended exclusively for this Convention and is not intended to prejudice the interpretation of the same or similar terms if used in connexion with any other international agreement.
Understanding Relating to Article II
It is the understanding of the Committee that the following examples are illustrative of phenomena that could be caused by the use of environmental modification techniques as defined in Article II of the Convention: earthquakes, tsunamis; an upset in the ecological balance of a region; changes in weather patterns (clouds, precipitation, cyclones of various types and tornadic storms); changes in climate patterns; changes in ocean currents; changes in the state of the ozone layer; and changes in the state of the ionosphere.
It is further understood that all the phenomena listed above, when produced by military or any other hostile use of environmental modification techniques, would result, or could reasonably be expected to result, in widespread, long-lasting or severe destruction, damage or injury. Thus, military or any other hostile use of environmental modification techniques as defined in Article II, so as to cause those phenomena as a means of destruction, damage or injury to another State Party, would be prohibited.
Before you call me crazy….google a few government websites. Especially the patent sites. Then we can talk about it.
More interesting sites to review: –
Your Congress Knows all these things….and allows it all to continue. Sponsor:
Rep. Kucinich, Dennis J. [D-O H-10] (Introduced 10/02/2001)
Committees: House – Science; Armed Services; International Relations
04/19/2002 Unfavorable Executive Comment Received from DOD. (All Actions)
CONGRESSIONAL HOUSE BILL PRESENTED BY DENNIS KUCINICH 2002