The Constitution Is Not Left To Private Interpretation

Constitution%20Founders%20Understood
It’s not about Cruz, Rubio or Obama. It is about an attack on the United States Constitution. To allow the blatant ignoring of the statutes that specifically spell out the proper code of law to be followed, the code that is used as the base for all other law to follow…is a direct attack on the law of the land itself.
We must never allow candidates, nor any individual to usurp the constitution and the legal requirements to run for the office of the president, any more than we should allow any to usurp the first amendment of freedom that assures us that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people to peaceably assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Nor the second amendment that insures us a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Anyone who will hold to their fifth amendment right that no person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in time of War or public danger, nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation, is either hiding a truth or threatened in some manner.

Now if we hold these dearly, we must also hold dearly the other amendments, especially the fourteenth amendment that lays out the requirements of natural born and naturalized citizenship and the requirements to hold the office of the president. These requirements are clearly set forth, but those with differing opinions as to the interpretation thereof seem to be as many as those who have formed their own interpretation of Biblical scripture; therefore it is imperative that this matter be resolved by Judicial clarity, clearly following the precise wording and guidelines set forth by our founding fathers who clarified the meaning for this very purpose, and to include the founding fathers discussions and written clarifications of intent and written resources used when finalizing these particular requirements.

Dianne Marshall

Share This Post!!

By Dianne Marshall