It is being said that the Supreme Court will hear complaints concerning the 2020 election. This isn’t a ruling on election fraud… the ruling is to be on not addressing complaints within the ten days required. There are laws that when complaints are filed they must be ruled on within ten days… and this was not done.
If the Supreme Court finds they indeed were denied their rights, and the Supreme Court rules on what the law states as law and that law was not upheld, that would annul the 2020 election and place President Trump back as president until another election can be held. That is the supreme law of the land in the constitution. But the question is…. Will the Supreme Court enforce the constitutional law? Or will they rule against the petition?
If they uphold the constitution and bill of rights, this means all who worked in agreement to deny the peoples rights, will be held responsible for their actions according to the law as it is written in the constitution. So what will this mean for them?
In a nutshell, it means that by denying the people’s right to be heard, they broke the constitution and the laws for that are removal from office and possibly charges of treason. Some have forgotten that they work for the people and they are not kings, queens, nor dictators. The United States is a Republic. But most detrimental is that when Congress proceeded to certify the vote without any investigation, they put America at risk to be captured, and occupied by an Act of War, leaving the government vulnerable to be toppled and taken over by foreign powers. The executive order on foreign and domestic election interference was enacted and these ignored that order in addition to denying the rights stated to each citizen in the constitution.
Presently there is a lot of talk on podcasts speculating outcomes, and some buzz that it has been rumored they already met on Sunday and the outcome has been made. However, there is no indication that any formal announcement has been said, one way or the other on the case as of yet, nor is there any information supporting that rumor except podcasters bla, bla, bla. The same sorts that tell us to trust the plan and JFK Jr. is going to appear and be vice president. That bunch. Of which if JFK Jr. appears, I will be very happy that he is yet alive. Smile.
Here is the Supreme Court Case and the petition:
Some important legal points and excerpts from the petition are as follows:
On January 6, 2021, the 117th Congress held a proceeding and debate in Washington DC (“Proceeding”). Proceeding was for the purpose of counting votes under the 2020 Presidential election for the President and Vice President of the United States under Amendment XII. During this Proceeding over 100 members of U.S. Congress claimed factual evidence that the said election was rigged. The refusal of the Respondents to investigate this congressional claim (the enemy) is an act of treason and fraud by Respondents. A successfully rigged election has the same end result as an act of war; to place into power whom the victor wants, which in this case is Biden, who, if not stopped immediately, will continue to destroy the fundamental freedoms of Brunson and all U.S. Citizens and courts of law.
Due to the fact that this case represents a national security breach on a unprecedented level like never before seen seriously damaging and violating Brunson and coincidently effects every citizen of the U.S.A. and courts of law.
Therefore, Brunson moves this court to grant this petition, or in the alternative without continuing further, order the trial court to grant Brunson’s complaint in its fullest. Brunson’s complaint is the mechanism that can immediately remove the Respondents from office without leaving this country vulnerable without a President and Vice President.
Despite the grave importance of this case, the trial court granted Respondents motion to dismiss (“Motion”) by stating “IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that plaintiff Raland Brunson’s action is dismissed without prejudice”. (“Order”) This Order followed the trial court’s order to adopt its report and recommendation that Brunson did not get until close to the beginning of Oct. 2022 thus prejudicing Brunson from timely filing any objections, and the Order did not properly address Brunson’s opposition to the Motion. Brunson’s opposition clearly shows that Brunson has standing. Per Brunson’s opening brief and as outlined in Brunson’s said opposition (both not properly addressed by the lower courts) Brunson’s has standing and the trial court has full proper jurisdiction to rule on the merits of this case based
upon the following factors:
a) The case of American Bush v. City Of South Salt Lake, 2006 UT 40 140 P.3d. 1235 clearly states that the Constitution of the United States along with State Constitutions do not grant rights to the people. These instruments measure the power of the rulers but they do not measure the rights of the governed, and they are not the fountain of law nor the origin of the people’s rights, but they have been put in place to protect their rights. Therefore the statutes and case law cited by Respondents claiming immunity from Brunson’s claims in this instance are unconstitutional and this Court needs to rule in that manner.
b) “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.” Therefore, the purpose of the Constitution was written to protect our self evident rights. Constitution cannot be construed by any means, by any legislative, judicial and executive bodies, by any court of law to deny or disparage our rights. This is the supreme law of the land. “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made Pursuance thereof; . . shall be the supreme Law of the land; and the Judges in
every State shall be bound thereby.” Article VI of the Constitution.
c) The First Amendment of the Constitution states that Congress shall make no law prohibiting the right of the people to petition the Government for a redress of
d) “Our courts have consistently held that fraud vitiates whatever it touches, Morris v. House, 32 Tex. 492 (1870)”. Estate of Stonecipher v. Estate of Butts, 591 SW 2d 806. And “”It is a stern but just maxim of law that fraud vitiates everything into which it enters.” Veterans Service Club v. Sweeney. 252 S.W.2d 25. 27 (Kv.1952).” Radioshack Cory, v. ComSmart, Inc., 222 SW 3d 256
e) Due to the uniqueness of this case, the trial court does have proper authority to remove the Respondents from their offices under 18 U.S. Code § 2381 which states
“Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.” A court adjudicating that the Respondents, who have taken the Oath of Office, to be incapable of holding their offices or who have adhered to a domestic enemy, means nothing without such removal of office.
Read the whole petition here: Supreme Court of the United States
So it now appears that General Flynn has been detected as creating fake Q posts to move the patriots into what? A trap? A mindset? A coup? A plot? What is this all about?
First of all… who is the real Flynn? Is it the one on the left or the right? The one on the right is the one doing the road show with the carnival barker, and the council on foreign relation block chain crypto king pin who works for Strozk and the dirty trick squad doing covert operations for the FBI and spy networks and handles Clark the one self annointed to save America.
Get a bit nosy…. and check the ears for secret messages? Eye spy… with my little eye. Smile from cheek to cheek, show them teeth and chin up. Bit hairy huh?
The photo above was provided by Lin Wood.
Below I added some glasses and YIKES! That made it more obvious these are two different folks. RMD (rubber mask disorder) is rampant. Close look a likes are evident?
So… the question is… what’s up with the Flynn family? Are they suffering from RMD too?
Here is what other people are saying …
Fake Q Posts… why is he doing that?
The real Flynn wouldn’t have been so easily detected…or would he?
The post below shows Roger Stone in 2017… boasting of Flynn having a list of high level pedophiles and never showed them nor who they were. What was that all about? They are being called out and the questions are rolling out about their intentions. Now that we have learned about codes and letting people know things without saying it directly… it just makes a person imagine what that was all about. Was it innocent or informative for someone else we aren’t supposed to know about?
So what is the ex intelligence psyop king up to? Is he caught? Will he turn out to be a white hat? Or will he turn out to be a black hat?
Which lead us to Lin Wood and why they hate him and needed him out of the picture.
Now that is a mighty big claim to pass along from a defamation lawyer. But, then again Lin does his homework when it comes to learning the methods of the wood on the ax handle amongst fooling the trees. Well, he’s had his share of trusting such woodsmen in the past and today he carries a chain saw!!!
Now, Lin is asking do you know where that woodsman is, the one with the sharp blade and wooden ax handle?
Just as we have said here many times…. Grif Fren gets it!
I agree with Lin on this bit of advice…
Keep on pressing into the Kingdom of God. Press, press, press!