Of Queens and Kings… A War Torn Journey… The Veil Is Slowly Lifted

It’s always been a Joe Show… and now we are looking at the Puppets and how they have danced for their Masters…

Enter Robert Maxwell… and his pleasure to serve the Queen.

image 151

On November 5, 1991, Robert Maxwell went missing while traveling on his yacht near Spain’s Canary Islands. His body was later pulled from the Atlantic, showing no evidence of foul play. Different theories surrounding his death arose almost immediately – did he fall or was he pushed? And what sort of impact did his death have on his daughter, Ghislaine? We break down the entire story here. Read: Ghislaine Maxwell’s Father Mysteriously Died 30 Years Ago (thevintagenews.com)

Back story: Robert Maxwell- born on June 10, 1923, in the Czechoslovakian mountain village of Slatinské Doly, now known as Solotvyno and is part of Ukraine. His parents and four of his siblings died at Auschwitz after Nazi Germany occupied Hungary in 1944. Maxwell escaped the Holocaust in March 1940 by going to France and joining a group of Czechoslovakian volunteers in the French Foreign Legion.

After the Fall of France, Maxwell was evacuated with other Czechoslovak troops to Britain. He joined the British Army under the name Ivan du Maurier, apparently taken from a cigarette brand. While on assignment in Paris in July 1944, Maxwell met his future wife, Elisabeth Meynard. After the Second World War, Maxwell spent two years in occupied Germany with the British Foreign Office as head of the press. There, he was able to make business contacts that would help lead to the purchase of his first company, Pergamon Press.


By the 1960s, Pergamon Press was a thriving company that specialized in making technical journals “written by scientists and academics.” In 1964, the business was valued at about $3.5 million, or close to $29 million today. Ultimately, Maxwell would lose Pergamon Press in a financial scandal in 1969 but he repurchased it privately in 1974.

In 1981, Maxwell bought the British Printing Corporation – England’s largest printing source which was headed for bankruptcy. Maxwell revived the company and sold it back to its managers in 1987 for a big profit. In 1984, he also bought Mirror Group Newspapers, which published six major newspapers, including the Daily Mirror tabloid. He also purchased Berlitz International language instruction, Macmillan book publishers, (that controls the western educational system) and Official Airline Guides in 1989. In the last years of his life, he launched the European and acquired the New York Daily News.

image 152
Robert Maxwell holding The Daily Mirror, October 1984. (Photo Credit: Express/ Stringer)

Robert Maxwell’s goal was to build a media empire with transnational influence. At the end of the 1980s, Robert Maxwell had spent nearly $500 million trying to get his newspapers to compete in the United States. However, those efforts seemed to be paying off for Maxwell, as his entities generated nearly $3 billion in annual revenue.

image 153

Who would have ever dreamed that it would be Princess Diana… who in her humble cry for ‘her truth to be known’ would end up turning the tables on the maestro of propaganda.

But before we get into that…. let’s look at the backstory of Queen Elizabeth.

image 155

Queen Elizabeth II’s father was George VI, who was born on 14 December 1895.

He was King of of the United Kingdom and the Dominions of the British Commonwealth from 11 December 1936 until his death on 6 February 1952.

The Queen succeeded her father on the same day and reigned until her tragic death aged 96.

How did King George VI die?

Princess Elizabeth, then aged 25, was in Kenya on a royal tour when she learned of her father George VI’s death. They say in the news he died with lung cancer and other ailments, and  had ignored doctors’ advice to see his daughter off from London Airport on January 31. Elizabeth and her husband Philip planned to travel to Australia after a week in Kenya. But on the morning of February 6, 1952, the King was found dead from a coronary thrombosis in his bed at Sandringham in Norfolk. He died in his sleep; it was considered a “sudden” death, notwithstanding the King’s increasing frailty over the last years of his life. Even though no one knew it. (So the press said as they were told to say)  At the time, his cause of death was said to be “coronary thrombosis.” When Prince Philip broke the news to Elizabeth, she The eldest Princess, and first in line to the throne, flew back to London as Queen.

She formally proclaimed her accession at a meeting of the Accession Council – a ceremonial body made up of privy councillors, peers and senior officials – at St James’s Palace on February 8. Speaking after her meeting with the council, she said: “By the sudden death of my dear father I am called to assume the duties and responsibilities of sovereignty. “My heart is too full for me to say more to you today than I shall always work, as my father did throughout his reign, to advance the happiness and prosperity of my peoples, spread as they are all the world over.”

Elizabeth had inherited a war torn world wide empire that had been being dispersed do to a failing economy and war torn era. But more than that, she inherited a very corrupt den of thieves seeking to control the entire globe. And she had pledged to continue her father’s works.

We now have seen that history shows us a new method of taxation without having to deal with the cost of running a nation was much more profitable and so it was done. Nations get freedom and pay tribute (taxes) to the Crown. The era of having them ran more like a corporation where those on the board of directors call the shots and actually own the company by having stock in it. When it does well, they receive high dividends and when it does poorly the costs are incurred by the nations who are perceived to run the corporate structure…for as always their lenders hold the titles. What a grand way of operating a world Monarchy behind a veil. It works for the central banks and thus it works for the Crown.

Which bring us to… History is what you are told, it is rarely what really happened.

Today as the propaganda shoots forth that nothing like this has ever happened and bla, bla, bla…during the life of Diana…we must look that indeed something like this has happened and in the same life of the dear passing Queen. For as the second-born son of King George V, Queen Elizabeth’s father, Bertie, as he was known to friends and family, never expected to become king. When his father George V died on January 20, 1936, Bertie’s older brother ascended as King Edward VIII, just as had always been anticipated.

image 156
Queen Elizabeth’s father’s coronation took place on May 12, 1937, within his first six months on the throne. Read: https://www.rd.com/list/rare-photos-queen-elizabeth-her-father/

But, for reasons given and wondered about…King Edward VIII began hinting that he might not want to live the life of a king;  or so that is what is said. And indeed, in December 1936, King Edward VIII stepped down from the throne, it is said,  in order to marry an American divorcée Wallis Simpson. And the result of this was  that Queen Elizabeth’s father became King George VI, and his eldest child, Princess Elizabeth, became heir to the throne.  

Now this certainly makes one wonder why at the height of Great Britain’s Empire King Edward VIII would just say…I would rather marry a divorcee and not be King? Let my younger brother wear the crown?

What makes this interesting is King Edward abdicated without ever officially being crowned. Knowing today how things are done behind the veil…it is obvious something was a bit more awry than a man desiring to wed a woman from the USA. A divorced one at that. So what was the real reason?

image 157

As we learn how history always repeats itself… we see here that there was some division in ideas of Monarchy versus Progressive Monarchy…kinda the way it is with democracy versus progressive democracy. The couple was, as a result, virtually exiled by the Royal Family.

image 158

Read: King Edward VIII: Real reason for royal’s Nazi loyalties laid bare — ‘Self-interest!’ | Royal | News | Express.co.uk

I guess if you are funding both sides of the war and if you are involved in any way with multiple fronts, it is not acceptable to show it publicly any more than it was for Prescott Bush the banker, or the Rothschilds of London…or any Monarchy anywhere in the free world. Unless you are with the WEF. That seems to now be okay. That must be the part that is progressive in the “save our democracy” mantra.

image 159

Her formal coronation as Queen Elizabeth II took place on June 2, 1953, in London’s Westminster Abbey. She reigned for 70 years, until her  death on September 8, 2022 at age 96, making her son, Charles, the new King.

And here we are today. But, alas the years of Diana creep up and into the life of this new Kings beginnings.  Which his mantra for the RESET of global affairs of all…have struck a cord out of melody in the ears of the Brits – the yellow vests in the streets who have been protesting for fairness and meat for their tables.

image 160

So while flags were flown and soldiers fired gun salutes in London’s Green Park and the Tower of London, and also at Woolwich, Colchester, Edinburgh Castle, Stirling Castle, Cardiff, Belfast, York, Portsmouth, Plymouth and Dover Castle, with all the pomp and 41 gun royal salute, with the King’s Troop Royal Horse Artillery in full dress uniform ride out from Wellington Barracks and parade past Buckingham Palace there is something in the air that the smoke of the canons cannot hide.

As 2022 led the Queen to celebrate a staggering 70 years on the throne in a series of year-long events for the Platinum Jubilee, a voice from the past rings out as from the ground demanding justice. That voice, that cry for justice…that mere quivering muffle…. Is just beginning to sound.  Some say sound it shall and others are oblivious to what is even meant by such a remark.

But, prepare yourselves as we enter into the Maxwell years and another mysterious death. One of a very prominent Britain named Robert Maxwell who is said to be among Israeli intelligence as an M16 operative (similar to the CIA) and his dealings with the crown.

This brings us to another puzzling sequence of affairs and a long list of questions. Questions that many were not ready to address 25 years ago, and certainly not any time earlier than that… except for one voice. One strong but muffled voice. That voice of Princess Diana. It appears it is about to sound louder today than it did when she used it in her living days.

Read: Article from August 2022 titled:  A timeline of the Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell scandal: “November 2018: The Miami Herald revisits the handling of Epstein’s case in a series of stories focusing partly on the role of Acosta — who by this point is President Donald Trump’s labor secretary — in arranging his unusual plea deal. The coverage renews public interest in the case.”

 A timeline of the Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell scandal – ABC News (go.com)

Remember dates are important.

July 6, 2019: Epstein is arrested on federal sex trafficking charges after federal prosecutors in New York conclude that they weren’t bound by the terms of the earlier non-prosecution deal. Days later, Acosta resigns as labor secretary amid public outrage over his role in the initial investigation.

Aug. 10, 2019: Guards find Epstein dead in his cell at a federal jail in New York City. Investigators conclude he killed himself.

July 2, 2020: Federal prosecutors in New York charge Ghislaine Maxwell with sex crimes, saying she helped recruit the underage girls that Epstein sexually abused and sometimes participated in the abuse herself.

Dec. 30, 2021: After a month long trial, a jury convicts Maxwell of multiple charges, including sex trafficking, conspiracy and transportation of a minor for illegal sexual activity.

June 28, 2022: Maxwell is sentenced to 20 years in prison.

So questions remain of who, what, when, where, why?

image 161

Puzzle pieces and questions….

Maxwell’s father died November 5, 1991. Aproximately 31 years ago to this year.

Diana died 25 years ago this year.

Secret tapes recorded by Princess Diana in Kensington Palace in 1991 were later used by Andrew Morton to write the book “Diana: Her true story.” The story behind Princess Diana’s secret tapes (nbcnews.com)

What else did Princess Diana know?

Did Diana arrange her tapes to have her truths written before or after the death of Maxwell and did that have anything to do with any of her tapes. Like the ones that are missing?  

There are many different dates as to the actual recording of Diana’s personal story. But it appears that the first revealings taped were done in 1989. As it relates to an article “On Aug. 23, 1992, “Squidgygate” eruptedThe Sun published a front-page article about the contents of a secretly recorded audio tape of a conversation Diana had with childhood friend James Gilbey (whose nickname for her was “Squidgy”) on New Year’s Eve in 1989. Their chat included confessions about how miserable she was with Charles (“He makes my life real torture, I’ve decided”) and about her strained relationship with Queen Elizabeth II. Read: Prince Charles and Princess Diana’s Relationship Timeline | POPSUGAR Celebrity

A timeline of the Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell scandal – ABC News (go.com)

image 162

In an article “Robert Maxwell & The KGB”, from Dec. 20, 2019 by Mark Hackard we learn that:

“According to new revelations, the ultra-wealthy financier and elite sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein had a mentor who recruited him into Israeli intelligence early in his career: billionaire media tycoon Robert Maxwell. And nearly three decades before Epstein’s highly suspicious death, Maxwell would suffer a similar murky fate. What did Soviet intelligence know about Maxwell? KGB veteran Col. Nikolai Shvarev tells Moscow Center’s side of the story:

“At the beginning of the 1990s, his mysterious death became a sensation. And that’s just for starters, after all, 68-year-old Lord Robert Maxwell – owner of one of the largest media empires on the planet; a billionaire; friend of Leonid Brezhnev and other politicians around the world; a carouser and debauchee whose impressive size and ferocious personality earned him the nickname “the killer whale” – had died.” Read more: Robert Maxwell & the KGB | Espionage History Archive

We Now Look At Maxwell’s Death…

On November 4, 1991, Robert Maxwell had a phone call with his son Kevin, which turned into a screaming match. The next day, the two were scheduled to have an important meeting with the Bank of England, (Rothschilds) but instead, Robert was said to have gone vacationing on his yacht, named Lady Ghislaine, near the Canary Islands. (Now why would he do that?) According to his son, Keven, when asked by ‘The Sunday Times’, “We needed to prepare for the meeting, and I was a bit hacked off that he was going to leave it to the last minute.”

Remember they do one thing and tell us another.

Kevin would go on to tell The Sunday Times that this meeting focused on the Mirror Group’s liquidity. Robert Maxwell had defaulted on £50 million in loans from Goldman Sachs, and not only was the bank beginning to sell off its collateral, but this news was about to go public.

image 154

Kevin Maxwell never got to speak to his father again after their fight for the next day, on November 5, 1991, his father’s body was pulled out from the Atlantic Ocean.  It was said, that early that morning, just before 5 a.m., Maxwell complained to the crew that his room was too cold then some time after he simply took it upon himself to get naked and walk to the stern of the yacht, and just fall into the water. After all he must have fallen for the only mark on Robert’s body was a scrape on his shoulder. But if that’s hard to swallow, they added a bit more to the story and said Robert’s death was deemed to be caused by a heart attack combined with accidental drowning. But, if that’s still to hard to believe, fear not for they hired three pathologists to give a report, but…alas they could not agree on an official cause of death. So out of the blue and just like that, those dang conspiracy stories started and Maxwell was said to be murdered, or he was pushed off the yacht, or that he committed suicide because it was about to be revealed that his business was in financial trouble.

His death left the Maxwell family reputation in tatters and within weeks around £460 million was found to be missing from the pension funds of Robert’s companies. His death caused lack of confidence in his publishing empire, with banks calling in their massive loans and Maxwell’s companies soon collapsed.

So what about Ghislaine?

In 1991 the tapes were later used by Andrew Morton to write the book “Diana: Her true story.” Charles and Diana went on their last official trip together in October 1991 to Ontario, Canada, accompanied by their sons, and a few months later, Morton’s book Diana: Her True Story was released. It was immediately clear that Diana and her family had worked with the author directly, contributing not only family photographs but also deeply personal revelations. This lends credence that the original tapings began in 1989 and 1990 and led to the first headlines in the papers in 1991 as indicated. It appears it was the book itself that brought about the real  headlines… as it authenticated that the scandals were true and by the words of Diana herself. Which brought many of the royal secrets front and center and no longer a conspiracy theory against the Princess and royal family.

Andrew Morton  the book “Diana: Her true story was released in 1992.

image 164

It has been said that when “Diana – Her True Story” was first published in 1992, it forever changed the way the public viewed the British monarchy. At first it was one of those shockers that gave the reader mixed feelings that wavered between disbelief, belief and and a cherry picking of acceptance (the usual what one will believe and what one refuses to believe). It was met with either 100% support or some range of ridicule. Either way, it became the #1 New York Times bestselling biography and has become a unique literary classic, not just because of its explosive contents but also because of Diana’s intimate involvement and voice in the publication.

image 163

And This Year Princess Diana Is Back In The Headlines!  Coincidence?

Diana’s tapes were also said to have been recorded in 1992 and 1993. It appears that they were released in pieces over that time, AND NOT RECORDED AT THAT TIME.

image 165

The original tapes contained 50 hours of filmed work conducted over 18 months …

Which bring us back to the time frames. It must have indeed started on New Years Eve of 1989 or around that time… as time frames all fit together to lay out the big chain of events that rocked the presses in exclusive stories in 1991 before the actual book was released in 1992. It would have taken the 18 months prior to record and perhaps a bit longer to complete the book that made the big BOOM explosions in the press.  Imagine someone finally getting back at fake news and the royal propaganda at the house of gaslight!

More puzzle pieces:

The footage – 50 hours filmed over 18 months  – was never meant to be shown in public but courtiers warned Princess Diana that Settelen might sell it for his “pension”.

50 hours of tapes is a huge pile of ‘golden stuff’ and some of it I am sure is quite damning…so much so that I dare to believe it was ever published. But, that is my opinion. And the fact that many tapes went missing… I am sure others had thought of that too. Missing tapes must have haunted the Royal family since the day they were made. Oh how could they ever have inherited such an independent Princess and how were they do deal with her?

Seven of a total of 12 tapes were found by cops in a 2001 raid on the home of Diana’s butler Paul Burrell.

What did Diana know and what was the last straw?  What else was said on tapes once she got rolling? Was Maxwell ever brought up? If so, did it contribute to his mysterious death falling off his yacht at sea?

The tapes became the bigger scandal and were exchanging ownership…Settelen launched legal action to have tapes returned to him and then sold them to US network NBC, which broadcast some of the material in 2004.

At the time Tory MP Sir Teddy Taylor asked broadcasters not to use the tapes in Prince William or Harry’s lifetimes. In 2007 the BBC paid £30,000 to use excerpts in a documentary, but it was shelved amid controversy. At the time Tory MP Sir Teddy Taylor asked broadcasters not to use the tapes in Prince William or Harry’s lifetimes. In 2007 the BBC paid £30,000 to use excerpts in a documentary, but it was shelved amid controversy.

image 166

Then surprise, surprise here comes Ghislaine Maxwell almost like a scene from the dark side poking her fun at the little lamb trying to fight against all the wolves. There was much written on how Ghislaine poked fun at Princess Diana, and bragged about making her ‘cry’ Read: Ghislaine Maxwell poked fun at Princess Diana, bragged about making her ‘cry’ (thenews.com.pk)

This is so like a fairy tale…of good versus evil. And it is still being played out. The scenes have been real curtain pullers and the stage is still set for twists and turns in this historic take down between bringers of light and those who work in darkness.

image 167

Prince Andrew’s friend Ghislaine Maxwell – what did Diana know?

Oh the stomping grounds and the imaginations can run wild now that we know a bit of the Epstein story and his sex slave Island and Ghislaines part in all of it. Who would not be so angry at the evil ones…shedding a tear or a river… over the evil these have done and all who partook in it and still to this day are.

What did Diana know…and what did Diana say on her tapes. Especially the ones that have been hidden?

image 168

I’m sure it was something that would cause a man to get naked and jump in the sea. Did he have a millstone around his neck? Just asking for a friend. After all, it’s obvious her father Robert set Ghislaine up for this business endeavor with Epstein.


 “Ghislaine’s like: ‘Look, there we made her [Diana] cry, isn’t that funny? We hated Diana,'” Maria Farmer, who was a victim of Epstein and Maxwell’s, said in the BBC documentary House of Maxwell. “That’s what she said. I was like: ‘Oh my god, that’s horrible.’ They were very mean to her, like abusive, but they thought it was really funny. Very, very sick.”

Virginia Roberts, who was also a victim of Maxwell and Epstein, sued Prince Andrew for allegedly raping her when she was 17 years old, but they later settled. For her part, Maxwell was found guilty of five crimes, including sex trafficking. Read: Ghislaine Maxwell Reportedly ‘Hated’ Princess Diana, Was ‘Mean’ To Her (theroyalobserver.com) It appears that saying she is a mean person is the kindest thing that could be said of Ghislaine.

There are five tapes that are said to be missing.

Kevin Sim, who produced the stalled BBC documentary and is also behind the new Channel 4 programme, said: “I believe we’ve got seven tapes. “There are more but who knows where they are and what is on them.”

Intimate recordings of Princess Diana from the early 1990s were first shown by US channel NBCCredit: Splash News

What did the Diana tapes reveal?

In the tapes, Diana admits she and Charles did not have sex for seven years before their split. She also claims Prince Philip had encouraged Charles to cheat on her, telling him he could always go back to Camilla. And she recounts how she once went sobbing to the Queen for help saving her marriage.

She says the monarch replied: “I don’t know what you should do. Charles is hopeless.”

In another section Diana reveals how she “got burned” after she fell “deeply in love” with a bodyguard – believed to mean cop Barry Mannakee, who was  sacked amid rumours they slept together and was killed in a motorbike crash weeks later.

Which brings us to the question….

Why did Channel 4 show the Diana tapes then and how was  it allowed knowing it was so controversial?

The candid footage was revealed for the first time on British television on a Sunday in prime time in the documentary Diana: In Her Own words.

In 2017 – the tapes were released in a documentary – dates are important….

It was shown around for three weeks before the nation marked the 20th anniversary of her death in a Paris car crash on August 31, 1997.

Diana’s friends blasted the show as “intrusive” and said it will hurt Diana’s sons Prince William and Prince Harry, while Diana’s brother Charles Spencer also pleaded with Channel 4 to axe the programme.

Dickie Arbiter, former spokesman for The Queen, said: “The tapes were private. It doesn’t matter if the princess is alive or dead, private should mean private.

“Selling tapes like this is grubby blood money and tawdry.”

Ralph Lee, deputy chief creative officer at Channel 4, defended the decision to broadcast it saying the tapes were historically important. He said: “The word that’s been used is that the footage is somehow ghoulish. I don’t think anyone can watch the footage and actually think this footage is ghoulish. I think she is self-consciously and clearly taking part in a film process and I don’t think viewers will feel greatly uneasy with that. For British viewers to be able to see a candid, relaxed, informal Diana talking about her life and revealing her personal perspective on events that are now familiar to us is remarkable. Given that the only filmed interview that we’ve ever seen with her is the Martin Bashir Panorama interview this is a really unique historical archive.”

This week William and Harry spoke at great length about memories of their mother in the ITV documentary Diana, Our Mother, Her Life and Legacy. It was also said that the revelations in the documentary could spell disaster for Prince Charles’ hopes of making Camilla Queen.

Experts said the broadcast had scuppered Clarence House’s long running PR campaign to win support for the Duchess of Cornwall. Ya think?

Ingrid Seward editor of Majesty magazine said: “This is a blow. I shouldn’t think anyone at Clarence House dared watch it. They would have hated it because it just rakes up all the muck again.”


What a time to be alive. Grab some popcorn while it is still available and say no to the crickets … that will not be our next new snack no matter how many processing plants they build to produce them! Please let Charles, Joey and Klaus all know it!

image 170

So…we shall see what comes of this new King and the new wave of RESET.

An excerpt stated in Huff Post in 2017 when the second documentary was revealed from the article: “Diana’s Tapes – When Does The Past Become History?”

image 169

Duke of Windsor had links with the Nazis. If you accept that we need to understand our history to avoid repeating it, then it’s surely important we understand all its complexity. And the fact that 1930s Britain saw broad panorama of opinion about Nazi Germany really is part of all our story, not just the story of one family. But the question of public interest is itself a possible trap. We wouldn’t want Palace officials to determine that, would we? Or the representatives of any political party? Maybe we will have to fall back on something more impartial – like chronology.

It’s 20 years since Diana died. And maybe we need to codify not just what we can reasonably expect from our royals (or indeed from any other celebrities). We may need to decide just when the past does become history. It’s picking a figure out of the air, but – some 70 years, maybe? Three score years and ten no longer describes the average first world lifespan, but it’s long enough that everyone personally touched by a story like this is likely to have moved on in one or another way. Such a timescale would still allow us to explore the Duke of Windsor’s story. But, after a mere 20 years, the legend above Diana’s grave could still read R.I.P.Read: https://uk.news.yahoo.com/diana-apos-tapes-does-past-152405485.html

image 171

The most important tapes are the ones we have not seen. The ones the public has viewed is merely that of family strife and squabbles although casting a mirky darkness on such a Royal Family, it does not lend to the cost of death by sea, and crashes in tunnels. Although before their public reveal it was enough to get one killed even for knowing a thing or accused of a thing suspected as noted in the death of Diana’s body guard and others who were warned of meeting the same sort of tragic fate. So… believable?  Yes.

Buckle up… we are just beginning this ride and it appears to be a bumpy one with strong whirlwinds blowing!

Keep on pressing into the Kingdom of God. Press, press, press!


By Dianne Marshall

I don't sleep I write! Author, Graphic Artist, Researcher and lover of the truth.

5 5 votes
Article Rating
Notify of

To avoid waiting on comment approval; sign up with The Marshall Report or log-in with your WordPress.com ID.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments